In Brief
- The Facts:The most highly cited physician on early treatment of COVID-19 has come out with an explosive new interview suggesting the COVID vaccine is part of a bioterrorism initiative on the citizenry.
- Reflect On:How safe and effective is the COVID vaccine? Why are so many scientists, doctors and researchers, who are raising legitimate concerns, being completely censored and constantly “fact checked’?
Pause – set your Pulse…
Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.
Sharing the opinion of renowned professors of medicine, doctors and scientists that contradict or call into question the official narrative that’s given to us via government health authorities is not an easy thing to do these days.
Facebook third party fact checkers are quick to jump on any claim that goes against the grain. The White house recently admitted to ‘flagging’ posts for Facebook to censor over alleged COVID ‘misinformation.’
Sign up to our newsletter Big Tech censors independent media, stay connected to us through our newsletter. Click here to join.
A tremendous amount of effort has been spent “de-bunking” anything that casts doubt on what the masses have been told regardless of how much credibility, evidence or concern is behind the claim. Freedom of speech and the right to share opinions and evidence during a pandemic is something that would be welcomed, encouraged and necessary during such a time.
There are hundreds of examples of renowned scientists, doctors and experts in the field that have been subjected to extreme censorship during this pandemic, and Dr. Peter McCullough is one of them.
McCullough is a practicing cardiologist as well as a Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M University. He is the co-editor of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, and associate editor of the American Journal of Cardiology and Cardiorenal Medicine. He was also recently the Vice Chief of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, TX. He has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis, and in doing so has been subjected to censorship at unprecedented levels.
According to McCullough,
What we have discovered is that the suppression of early treatment was tightly linked to the development of a vaccine, and the entire program as this in a sense bioterrorism phase one was rolled out was really all about keeping the population in fear and in isolation and preparing them to accept the vaccine which appears to be phase two of a bioterrorism operation.
Both the respiratory virus and the vaccine deliver to the human body the spike protein, the gain of function target of this bioterrorism research.
In the full interview McCullough expressed a sharp criticism towards doctors who are following guidelines and acting in lockstep with government health authorities. He also offers a sharp criticism of the COVID vaccine, something we’ve covered in depth.
His statements, amongst others, are part of why we recently published an article explaining the top four reasons why so many people, doctors and scientists are concerned and hesitant to take the COVID vaccine.
The suppression of early treatment and interventions with regards to COVID infected people was something occurring on many levels. Many doctors, scientists and researchers were publishing studies regarding the success of these treatments involving Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, intravenous vitamin C and zinc. On the contrary, studies were simultaneously being published claiming that these interventions were useless and in some cases, dangerous.
Although there was controversy, some doctors were completely convinced by the data on these interventions and began began using them to treat patients.
For example, very sick coronavirus patients in New York state’s largest hospital system were being given massive doses of vitamin C- based on promising reports that it’s helped people in hard-hit China.
Dr. Andrew G. Weber, a pulmonologist and critical-care specialist affiliated with two Northwell Health facilities on Long Island, said his intensive-care patients with the coronavirus immediately receive. 1,500 milligrams of intravenous vitamin C. Identical amounts of the powerful antioxidant are then readministered three or four times a day…
The New York Post
A study published in Frontiers in Immunology titled “Quercetin and Vitamin C: An Experimental, Synergistic Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Related Disease (COVID-19)” concluded the following:
Quercetin displays a broad range of antiviral properties which can interfere at multiple steps of pathogen virulence -virus entry, virus replication, protein assembly- and that these therapeutic effects can be augmented by the co-administration of vitamin C. Furthermore, due to their lack of severe side effects and low-costs, we strongly suggest the combined administration of these two compounds for both the prophylaxis and the early treatment of respiratory tract infections, especially including COVID-19 patients.
Vitamin C is just one example of many. For example, a new meta-analysis was recently published in the American Journal of Therapeutics and has concluded that “moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin.”
Again, there are publications that advise against the use of these interventions, but what really caught people’s attention was the fact that these drugs were censored, labelled as “fake news” and the thoughts of “conspiracy theorists.” It was and still remains one of many great examples with regards to the “suppression of early treatment” that McCullough mentions above.
McCullough’s comments about the spike protein and gain of function research have also been heavily “fact-checked.” Fact checkers have claimed to have debunked these ideas, and emphasize that they are completely false. Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens.
McCullough isn’t the only one in the field who has suggested that COVID is a product of bioterrorism. Early on in the pandemic, Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Act, gave multiple statements claiming that COVID is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about it. He was subjected to censorship and fact-checking as well.
We also all recall that early on in the pandemic the “lab leak” theory discussion was not allowed to happen.
As far as McCullough’s statement regarding the spike protein, they’ve been made before. Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist from the University of Guelph recently released a detailed, in-depth report regarding safety concerns about the COVID vaccines. In that report, concerns regarding the spike protein that the vaccine prompts our cells to make are clear, that the vaccine materials do not stay at the injection site and this in turn raiseses multiple short term and long term health concerns.
You can read more about his situation and updates, here.
At the end of the day, there are a lot of brilliants scientists, doctors and experts in the field being censored and called “conspiracy theorists” for sharing their opinion. Never in a million years would I have thought that such censorship and limitations on freedom of speech would be seen in our time. Why does the mainstream continue to ignore the opinions, evidence and information that so many experts are bringing forth?
Mainstream media is a major hub of perception control, meaning that the masses consume information solely from these platforms. If information is completely censored from these platforms, the masses simply won’t be aware of the fact that another perspective on this pandemic exists, and persists. Furthermore, if mainstream media is used to ridicule something, the watcher who relies on mainstream media, follows.
This is another reason why it’s important to support independent media outlets who do not receive funding from governments or big corporations.
